NJ Admin Court Honors Non-Religious Vaccine Exemption Against Private Employer

By Ralph Fucetola JD - Vitamin Lawyer Health Freedom Blog
Our America Initiative Advisory Counsel Member of Health Care Freedom

This decision is important because it effectively extends the vaccine religious exemption beyond strictly religious conscientious objection to include "secular" objections to mandated vaccinations. This is similar to the process that occurred during the Viet Nam War Draft, where religious CO status was extended to any person, even the non-religious, who objected to serving involuntarily. Note this case is an Unemployment Insurance case regarding whether the employee was justified in quitting over the vaccine mandate. rf...

Employee Had First Amendment Right To Refuse Flu Shot, N.J. Court Rules
by Mary Pat GallagherNew Jersey Law JournalJune 5, 2014 
http://www.njlawjournal.com/printerfriendly/id=1202658132905
"Denying unemployment benefits to a nurse fired for refusing a flu vaccine for secular reasons violated her First Amendment right to freedom of expression, where hospital policy allowed employees to skip the shot on religious grounds, a N.J. appeals court held on Thursday in a precedential case.
The court reversed the state Department of Labor's Board of Review, which had found that the vaccination policy of June Valent's former employer, Hackettstown Community Hospital, was reasonable and that her refusal to comply with it amounted to "simple misconduct" connected to her job that justified disqualifying her from unemployment benefits. 
'The Board's decision upholding appellant's termination unconstitutionally discriminated against her freedom of expression by improperly endorsing the employer's religion-based exemption to the flu vaccination policy and rejecting the secular choice proffered by appellant,' the Appellate Division said in Valent v. Board of Review."

The Court further stated:

"The religion-based exemption irrefutably illustrates that the flu vaccination policy is not based exclusively on public health concerns because an employee claiming an exemption is only required to sign a form attesting to his or her faith-based reason for refusing to be vaccinated, accompanied with an appropriate note from a religious leader," Fuentes wrote for the panel. 
"These requirements are facially unrelated to public health issues, patient safety concerns, or scientifically valid reasons for the containment of the flu virus," he said, adding that the religion exemption "merely discriminates against an employee's right to refuse to be vaccinated based only on purely secular reasons."
Do you like this post?

Showing 1 reaction


commented 2014-08-15 10:16:07 -0600 · Flag
In my opinion it is our own individual rights what we choose or choose not to put into our bodies but at the same time we have to educate our selves on the potential consequences that may or may not happen.

In addition, we can not be taking away others individual free agency to choose. I have often heard debates on the pros and cons of being vaccinated. Some say that its causing negative long term effects in children but other say they have lost infants because they were not old enough to be vaccinated and they were exposed to none vaccinated children or adults.

The simple truth is we need to educate our selves, we need to be mindful of those around us if we choose not to be vaccinated. I personal have been vaccinated and have never had any health issues so my question is why do others? I am interested in hearing some thoughts and opinions.